|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 6, 2008 20:49:38 GMT -5
Do people insulting you bother you that much"DooooD? Lest not forget, I, like you, even in your anonymity, am a private citizen, not elected or public in any way and have every right to protections agaisnt libel, on and off the internet and NCO should be fully aware of how such carelessness in ethics and integrity can be very detrimental. Maybe their attorney should present an opinion in their behalf on libel issues. Could it be I am just collecting documentation? Neither you, nor anyone, have contacted the admin of this site, nor NorthCoastOregon.com requesting posts be removed for any reason, much less alledging that the post was in some way libelous. Many have contacted NorthCoastOregon requesting you be banned from posting because of your verbal assaults. However, since you have mentioned here that you might be collecting documentation and we don't want/like or have time to be placed in the circumstances of defending ourselves after you have baited people to respond to you, we have made various changes to the board to do what we can to protect your name/identity from further "attacks," real or imagined. One way to keep yourself from being attacked is to either find a point of agreement or simply quit posting. ~ CB ( -we only have this set to one admin and really don't have the time to figure out how to change it, yet. This forum was set up so that it would be easy to use with little moderation we didn't figure we would need many moderators ). I must insist that you quote specifically, verbatim the specific instances of verbal assaults you are refering to. This entire thread was my view on the sillyness of what NCO was calling "Commissioner's Corner" that failed miserably, in my view and also in my view, a wish that something like that could legitimately work with effective dialogue to resolve issuses as opposed to, in my view, being used as an instrument to save some politicians ass. Verbal Assault? |
|
|
|
Post by CB on Nov 6, 2008 23:00:29 GMT -5
Neither you, nor anyone, have contacted the admin of this site, nor NorthCoastOregon.com requesting posts be removed for any reason, much less alledging that the post was in some way libelous. Many have contacted NorthCoastOregon requesting you be banned from posting because of your verbal assaults. However, since you have mentioned here that you might be collecting documentation and we don't want/like or have time to be placed in the circumstances of defending ourselves after you have baited people to respond to you, we have made various changes to the board to do what we can to protect your name/identity from further "attacks," real or imagined. One way to keep yourself from being attacked is to either find a point of agreement or simply quit posting. ~ CB ( -we only have this set to one admin and really don't have the time to figure out how to change it, yet. This forum was set up so that it would be easy to use with little moderation we didn't figure we would need many moderators ). I must insist that you quote specifically, verbatim the specific instances of verbal assaults you are refering to. This entire thread was my view on the sillyness of what NCO was calling "Commissioner's Corner" that failed miserably, in my view and also in my view, a wish that something like that could legitimately work with effective dialogue to resolve issuses as opposed to, in my view, being used as an instrument to save some politicians ass. Verbal Assault? I said, quite specifically, that THEY wrote to us complaining that you were verbally assaulting people in your posts. We do not have the time or desire to monitor adults and then play referee when someone, such as yourself, says prove it and go back through tons of comments and threads to look for or find it, especially when we aren't using names but IPs, which then people would whine that we were invading their privacy or, or, or. We chose to deal with things as we chose to. We provide this place, it has few rules. If you like it here, are getting what you want, and abide by the few rules, you are free to stay. |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 7, 2008 0:35:27 GMT -5
"Many have contacted NorthCoastOregon requesting you be banned from posting because of your verbal assaults"I must insist that you quote specifically, verbatim the specific instances of verbal assaults you are refering to. This entire thread was my view on the sillyness of what NCO was calling "Commissioner's Corner" that failed miserably, in my view and also in my view, a wish that something like that could legitimately work with effective dialogue to resolve issuses as opposed to, in my view, being used as an instrument to save some politicians ass. Verbal Assault? I said, quite specifically, that THEY wrote to us complaining that you were verbally assaulting people in your posts. We do not have the time or desire to monitor adults and then play referee when someone, such as yourself, says prove it and go back through tons of comments and threads to look for or find it, especially when we aren't using names but IPs, which then people would whine that we were invading their privacy or, or, or. We chose to deal with things as we chose to. We provide this place, it has few rules. If you like it here, are getting what you want, and abide by the few rules, you are free to stay. I said quite specifically that I insist you print verbatim the verbal assaults North Coast Oregon and its staff are accusing me of based on an alleged complaint by some unnamed posters and without documentation. You chose to deal with this by replacing my name with the ancient Scottish seat of my family's name "Balmaghie" in an obvious attempt to pretend it will all go away if you do so? Free to stay? I notice there is no membership or subscrption requirement herer and I am free to come and go as I please and I do so without and pretense or the use of any phoney names and hold myself completely accountable for what I say and still, you and a few unknown accuse me of "Verbal Assault"? Once again, I insist you print, verbatim, the verbal assualts this site is accusing me of. |
|
|
|
Post by CB on Nov 7, 2008 0:50:38 GMT -5
I said, quite specifically, that THEY wrote to us complaining that you were verbally assaulting people in your posts. We do not have the time or desire to monitor adults and then play referee when someone, such as yourself, says prove it and go back through tons of comments and threads to look for or find it, especially when we aren't using names but IPs, which then people would whine that we were invading their privacy or, or, or. We chose to deal with things as we chose to. We provide this place, it has few rules. If you like it here, are getting what you want, and abide by the few rules, you are free to stay. I said quite specifically that I insist you print verbatim the verbal assaults North Coast Oregon and its staff are accusing me of based on an alleged complaint by some unnamed posters and without documentation. You chose to deal with this by replacing my name with the ancient Scottish seat of my family's name "Balmaghie" in an obvious attempt to pretend it will all go away if you do so? Free to stay? I notice there is no membership or subscrption requirement herer and I am free to come and go as I please and I do so without and pretense or the use of any phoney names and hold myself completely accountable for what I say and still, you and a few unknown accuse me of "Verbal Assault"? Once again, I insist you print, verbatim, the verbal assualts this site is accusing me of. At this time, neither NorthCoastOregon nor its staff have accused you of anything. |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 7, 2008 10:28:32 GMT -5
However, since you have mentioned here that you might be collecting documentation and we don't want/like or have time to be placed in the circumstances of defending ourselves after you have baited people to respond to you, we have made various changes to the board to do what we can to protect your name/identity from further "attacks," real or imagined.
I've never said I was gathering any documentation whatsoever.
Show me where that was said.
I did say, in context to a particular post in part, "Could it be I am gathering documentation?"
Show me specifically where I was baiting anybody as you have accused me of so doing.
Explain to me why it is you have gone through this thread, "Commissioner's Corner: What a Joke" and changed my name to "Balmaghie"[/b] on posts, without my permission, if, it is as you say, you are not accusing or singling me out for censure or sanctioning.
I disagree
|
|
Jive Turkey Detector
Guest
|
Post by Jive Turkey Detector on Nov 7, 2008 22:07:18 GMT -5
I must insist that you quote specifically, verbatim the specific instances of verbal assaults you are refering to. I said quite specifically that I insist you print verbatim the verbal assaults North Coast Oregon and its staff are accusing me of based on an alleged complaint by some unnamed posters and without documentation.... Once again, I insist you print, verbatim, the verbal assualts this site is accusing me of.... How's that workin' out for ya, Acorn? |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 8, 2008 14:20:07 GMT -5
I must insist that you quote specifically, verbatim the specific instances of verbal assaults you are refering to. I said quite specifically that I insist you print verbatim the verbal assaults North Coast Oregon and its staff are accusing me of based on an alleged complaint by some unnamed posters and without documentation.... Once again, I insist you print, verbatim, the verbal assualts this site is accusing me of.... How's that workin' out for ya, Acorn? Sorry but I must refrain from any further discussion on this particular issue |
|
|
|
Post by Get Over It on Nov 8, 2008 15:18:26 GMT -5
This seems akin to CCBofC' warped concept of "Community Building". Witihin their circle it seems to make sense to at least three of them but doesn't get traction with anybody else. Seems to have gotten "traction" with at least 1400+ other people. YOU are the one that makes RIDICULOUSLY exaggerated statements. Grow up! You constantly tell others to "get over it" when it comes to elections. "Work together & get over it". Take your own advice and GET OVER IT. The majority of people in their districts voted for these people to run the county. NOW, GET OVER IT. |
|
|
|
Post by Chief OHara on Nov 8, 2008 15:27:37 GMT -5
Sorry but I must refrain from any further discussion on this particular issue Saints be praised. |
|
|
|
Post by *** on Nov 8, 2008 20:03:52 GMT -5
This seems akin to CCBofC' warped concept of "Community Building". Witihin their circle it seems to make sense to at least three of them but doesn't get traction with anybody else. Seems to have gotten "traction" with at least 1400+ other people. YOU are the one that makes RIDICULOUSLY exaggerated statements. Grow up! You constantly tell others to "get over it" when it comes to elections. "Work together & get over it". Take your own advice and GET OVER IT. The majority of people in their districts voted for these people to run the county. NOW, GET OVER IT. But this particular election is not over and with, at the moment, only 15 votes, pending a final count, seperating Roberts from Scheller (*/-)1385 people want Incumbent Roberts out of that seat and gone in preference to Scheller. I would say, at this point, Scheller has as much traction and odds as Roberts. |
|
|
|
Post by Waassup withthat on Nov 8, 2008 22:23:31 GMT -5
Seems to have gotten "traction" with at least 1400+ other people. YOU are the one that makes RIDICULOUSLY exaggerated statements. Grow up! You constantly tell others to "get over it" when it comes to elections. "Work together & get over it". Take your own advice and GET OVER IT. The majority of people in their districts voted for these people to run the county. NOW, GET OVER IT. But this particular election is not over and with, at the moment, only 15 votes, pending a final count, seperating Roberts from Scheller (*/-)1385 people want Incumbent Roberts out of that seat and gone in preference to Scheller. I would say, at this point, Scheller has as much traction and odds as Roberts. That's not the point. The point is YOU said 1) No one but three of the Commissioners think what they are doing is community building. 1400+ prove you were WRONG. 2) YOU weren't posting here anymore. |
|
|
|
Post by concerned citizen on Nov 8, 2008 22:37:36 GMT -5
The point is YOU said 1) No one but three of the Commissioners think what they are doing is community building. 1400+ prove you were WRONG. Ouch! thats gonna leave a mark, oh yeahh. 2) YOU weren't posting here anymore. Clear evidence again that ... is a FLIP-FLOPPER!! |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 9, 2008 11:55:56 GMT -5
Concerned Citizen said:
The point is YOU said 1) No one but three of the Commissioners think what they are doing is community building. 1400+ prove you were WRONG.
And in my view, 1385+/- in Robert's district prove me right with another 100 or so still out there to be counted.
In my view, as well, the citizens have yet to speak for the other two.
|
|
Short lived respite
Guest
|
Post by Short lived respite on Nov 9, 2008 16:06:06 GMT -5
Concerned Citizen said:
The point is YOU said 1) No one but three of the Commissioners think what they are doing is community building. 1400+ prove you were WRONG. And in my view, 1385+/- in Robert's district prove me right with another 100 or so still out there to be counted.In my view, as well, the citizens have yet to speak for the other two. How can they prove you right? You said only 3 believed that the commissioners were community builders. You did NOT say more people believed they weren't community builders than believed they were. Good grief, man. Learn how to present a valid argument. The citizens spoke when they voted them into office, duffus. Now you are going to say that no one really had a say about YOU because it doesn't count unless you have been in office for a while and beat or lost to a recall. NOW THAT'S TWISTED! However, by your reckoning, the people have never really spoken out about Marquis or any other local politician that has run unopposed or without a recall. |
|
|
|
Post by Patrick ... on Nov 9, 2008 16:45:54 GMT -5
Concerned Citizen said:
The point is YOU said 1) No one but three of the Commissioners think what they are doing is community building. 1400+ prove you were WRONG. And in my view, 1385+/- in Robert's district prove me right with another 100 or so still out there to be counted.In my view, as well, the citizens have yet to speak for the other two. How can they prove you right? You said only 3 believed that the commissioners were community builders. You did NOT say more people believed they weren't community builders than believed they were. Good grief, man. Learn how to present a valid argument. The citizens spoke when they voted them into office, duffus. Now you are going to say that no one really had a say about YOU because it doesn't count unless you have been in office for a while and beat or lost to a recall. NOW THAT'S TWISTED! However, by your reckoning, the people have never really spoken out about Marquis or any other local politician that has run unopposed or without a recall. The simple fact of the matter on the subject of Roberts is, in my view, that seat in her district is still up for grabs. |
|
